增加检测STR和引入参考样本对叔侄关系鉴定的效能分析
|
孔倩倩, 陈丽琴, 李成涛, 刘希玲
|
Efficiency Analysis of Uncle-Nephew Relationship Identification by Increasing STR Markers and Adding Reference Samples
|
Qian-qian KONG, Li-qin CHEN, Cheng-tao LI, Xi-ling LIU
|
|
表1 5种叔侄关系鉴定模型在19、39、55个STR检测体系的模拟数据和真实样本的lgLR均值
|
Tab. 1 The mean of lgLR values of five models of uncle-nephew relationship identification by using 19, 39 and 55 STR in simulated data and true samples
|
|
来源 | (AB) | (AB)-UR | (ABC)A | (ABC)A-UR | (ABE)A | (ABE)A-UR | (ABD)B | (ABD)B-UR | (ABM)B | (ABM)B-UR |
---|
模拟数据 | | | | | | | | | | | 55 STR | 3.970 3 | -3.539 8 | 6.240 5 | -7.856 0 | 6.261 6 | -6.756 5 | 6.229 0 | -5.321 1 | 6.182 7 | -5.196 9 | 39 STR | 3.091 3 | -2.755 0 | 4.951 5 | -6.433 6 | 4.951 4 | -5.312 8 | 4.887 7 | -4.186 5 | 4.895 6 | -4.084 6 | 19 STR | 1.516 3 | -1.339 3 | 2.449 8 | -3.184 9 | 2.439 1 | -2.565 4 | 2.410 0 | -2.012 2 | 2.380 6 | -1.960 0 | 真实样本 | | | | | | | | | | | 55 STR | 3.012 0 | -3.787 2 | 3.970 8 | -9.090 1 | 5.852 6 | -7.073 7 | 5.048 8 | -6.119 9 | 4.648 8 | -5.700 8 | 39 STR | 2.555 0 | -2.985 5 | 3.883 6 | -7.255 8 | 4.652 1 | -5.492 6 | 3.998 9 | -4.717 6 | 4.067 1 | -4.418 3 | 19 STR | 0.994 9 | -1.467 6 | 1.620 5 | -3.915 1 | 1.977 8 | -2.723 1 | 1.596 2 | -2.447 2 | 1.759 8 | -2.178 1 |
|
|
|