法医学杂志

法医学杂志 ›› 1992, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 100-103+.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

眼外伤劳动能力评定及其相关因素研究

刘鑫;常林;胡红;王岩;吴宝琛;   

  1. 北京市高级人民法院,北京市高级人民法院,北京市高级人民法院,北京市高级人民法院,北京市高级人民法院 北京 100039,北京 100039,北京 100039,北京 100039,北京 100039
  • 发布日期:1992-06-25 出版日期:1992-06-28

A STUDY ON APPRAISING LABOUR ABILITY AND CORRELATIVE FACTORS AFTER OCULAR INJURY

BEIJING HIGHER PEOPLE'S COURT(100039) LIU XIN, CHANG LIN, HU HONG, WANG YAN, WU BAOCHEN   

  • Online:1992-06-25 Published:1992-06-28

摘要： 为研究眼睛损伤后的劳动能力及其相关因素,我们将28例有损害赔偿请求的眼外伤案例进行研究(A组),同时,我们随机选择两个含有28例的对照组(B组是要求损伤程度评定的眼外伤组,C组是有损害赔偿请求的非眼伤组),A、C两组都用我室自制的《人体损伤后劳动能力评定及其生活补助费赔偿标准》进行评定,使用统计学方法对所有资料进行分析,结果表明:(1)A组的年龄分布频率曲线峰态呈双峰,而B组为单峰;(2)在A组与B组之间,损伤类型(P<0.001)和致伤物(P<0.001)均有显著差异;(3)在A组与C组中,职业(P<0.005)和请求损害赔偿费(P<0.001)有显著差异。我们对眼外伤后的劳动能力评定及损害赔偿的特点进行讨论,指出晶体透明度下降后的弱视和人工晶体植入术对鉴定的影响。

关键词: 眼外伤眼, 穿通伤, 劳动能力评定, 伤害赔偿, 人工晶体植入术, 弱视

Abstract: For studing labour ability and correlative factors after ocular injury, we performed twenty-eight ocular injnring cases (A group) with damages, in the same time, we selected randomly two control groups of 28 cases(B group was ocular injury with injured degree and C group was non-ocular injury with damages). Eeither of A group and C group was valuated by the Trial Draft-Standard for Appraising Labour Ability and Damages to injured Human Body, which was made by ourselves. We used statistical methods to analysis all data. The results revealing: (1) A group's kurtosis of age ranging frequency carve was double and B was single, (2)between A group and B group, types (p<0.001)and injurants (p<0.001) of ocular injury were significant difference, (3) occupations (p<0.005) and asking damages (p<0.001) were different significantly betwent A group and C group. We discussed characteristics of appraisng labour ability and damages after ocular injury, and indicated effect of amblyopia and Intraoular Lens Implantation after lens opacity.