法医学杂志 ›› 2006, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 297-298+.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

摩托车防盗锁致伤分析

王晟明;张立雄;莫传莹;竞花兰;成建定;   

  1. 广州市公安局黄埔区分局,汕头市公安局潮阳区分局,广州市公安局黄埔区分局,中山大学中山医学院法医学系,中山大学中山医学院法医学系 广东广州510700,广东汕头515100,广东广州510700,广东广州510080,广东广州510080
  • 发布日期:2006-08-25 出版日期:2006-08-28

Analysis on the Injury by Lock-against-theft

WANG SHENG-MING1, ZHANG LI-XIONG2, MO CHUAN-YING1, JING HUA-LAN3, CHENG JIAN-DING3 (1.THE BUREAR OF PUBLIC SECURITY OF HUANGPU,GUANGZHOU 510700, CHINA; 2.THE BUREAR OF PUBLIC SECURITY OF CHAOYANG, SHANTOU 515100,CHINA; 3.DEPARTMENT OF FORENSIC PATHOLOGY,B   

  • Online:2006-08-25 Published:2006-08-28

摘要: 使用摩托车防盗锁伤害人身的案件近来较为多见。本文通过对28例摩托车防盗锁致伤的法医学检验资料的分析,仔细询问伤者,确认致伤过程,详细分析其损伤形态及形成机理,以期总结摩托车防盗锁的致伤特点,为通过形态学推断摩托车防盗锁致伤及其过程提供依据。

关键词: 损伤形态, 摩托车防盗锁, 作案工具推断

Abstract: Nowdays, it is common seen that criminals tend to use the lock-against-theft for motorcycle to harm others as a tool. In order to find out the chief characters of this kind of injury, 28 cases in which victims were hurt by lock-against-theft for motorcyclewere analyzed. In each case, the victims carefully questioned to confirm the damage procedure. Furthermore, the wound configuration was observed and the forming mechanism was deduced to provide morphological evidences for the judgement in this kind of case.

Key words: wound configuration, lock-against-theft for motorcycle, judgement of tools in a criminal case