法医学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 666-671.DOI: 10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2020.05.011

• 论 著 • 上一篇    下一篇

单相机摄影测量法在法医学三维重构中的影响因素分析

邹冬华1,2 ,王金明1 ,陈忆九1 ,李正东1 ,汪家文2 ,秦志强1 ,黄江2   

  1. 1. 司法鉴定科学研究院 上海市法医学重点实验室 司法部司法鉴定重点实验室 上海市司法鉴定专业技 术服务平台,上海 200063;2. 贵州医科大学法医学院,贵州 贵阳 550004
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-29 发布日期:2020-10-25 出版日期:2020-10-28
  • 通讯作者: 秦志强,男,主任法医师,主要从事法医病理学研究;E-mail:qingzq@ssfjd.cn 黄江,女,教授,博士,博士研究生导师,主要从事法医物证学、法医人类学教学、科研和检案;E-mail:mmm_hj@126.com
  • 作者简介:邹冬华(1981—),男,副研究员,主要从事法医病理学与生物力学研究;E-mail:zoudh@ssfjd.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划资助项目(2016YFC0800702);国家自然科学基金资助项目(81571851,81701863,81722027);上海市 法医学重点实验室资助项目(17DZ2273200);上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台资助项目(19DZ2290900);中央级科研院所基本 科研业务费资助项目(GY2020G-4)

Analysis of Influencing Factors of Single Camera Photogrammetry in Forensic Three-Dimensional Reconstruction

ZOU Dong-hua1,2 , WANG Jin-ming1 , CHEN Yi-jiu1 , LI Zheng-dong1 , WANG Jia-wen2 , QIN Zhi-qiang1 , HUANG Jiang2   

  1. 1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Key Laboratory of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, Shanghai Forensic Service Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai 200063, China; 2. School of Forensic Medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China
  • Received:2020-07-29 Online:2020-10-25 Published:2020-10-28

摘要: 目的 分析摄影设备、焦距及重建软件中重建质量的选择等因素对单相机摄影测量法重构结果的 影响,为单相机摄影测量法的法医学应用提供参考。 方法 采用传统测量法和单相机摄影测量法分别测 量19个颅骨,分析两种测量法的差异及相同摄影设备不同焦距组的组内差异。以1例颅骨和1具尸体为研 究对象,根据摄影测量软件中重建质量分为5个等级,以光学扫描重构模型为参考模型,单相机摄影测量法 重构模型为测试模型,最佳拟合对齐后进行 3D 偏差分析并计算误差均值及均方根(root mean square, RMS)值。 结果 EOS 7D变焦组与传统测量法对比,以及相同摄影设备的组内对比差异均具有统计学意 义(P<0.05)。单相机摄影测量法重构的颅骨与尸体三维模型的比较误差均值和RMS值的最小值存在于重 建中等质量,趋势基本一致。 结论 摄影设备和焦距对单相机摄影测量法结果无明显影响,较低的重建质 量易引起畸变,而较高的重建质量易产生噪点,以中等质量为宜。

关键词: 法医病理学;摄影术;结构光学扫描;成像, 三维

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the influence of factors such as the selection of equipment, focal length and the selection of reconstruction quality in the reconstruction software on the reconstruction results of single camera photogrammetry and provide reference for the forensic application of single camera photogrammetry. Methods The 19 skulls were measured by traditional measurement method and single camera photogrammetry. The differences between the two measurement methods and within the group with same equipment but different focal length were analyzed. One skull and one corpse were selected as the research objects. According to the reconstruction quality selection conditions in the photogrammetric software, the experimental group was divided into five grades. The model reconstructed by optical scanner was defined as reference model, while the model reconstructed by single camera photogrammetry was defined as test model. The test model was aligned with the reference model, 3D deviation analysis was carried out and the mean error and root mean square (RMS) values were calculated. Results The differences between EOS 7D zoom group and traditional measurement, and within the group with same equipment had statistical significance (P<0.05). The mean error value and minimum RMS value of the skull reconstructed by single camera photogrammetry and the three-dimensional model of the corpse existed in the medium quality group, and the trend was basically the same. Conclusion The equipment and focal length has no obvious influence on the results of single camera photogrammetry. Lower reconstruction quality can easily cause distortion, while higher reconstruction quality can easily generate noise, so medium quality is preferred.

Key words: forensic pathology, photography, structured-light scanning, imaging, three-dimensional

中图分类号: