法医学杂志

法医学杂志 ›› 2006, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 305-306.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

静脉给药致过敏性休克死亡27例法医学分析

鲁平;包朝胜;王立新;   

  1. 杭州市人民检察院,浙江省人民检察院,余杭地区人民检察院 浙江杭州310012,浙江杭州310012,浙江杭州311100
  • 发布日期:2006-08-25 出版日期:2006-08-28

Analysis on 27 Autopsy Cases Died of Anaphylactic Shock Induced by Mainline

LU PING1, BAO CHAO-SHENG2, WANG LI-XIN3 (1.THE PEOPLE′S PROCURATORATE OF HANGZHOU, HANGZHOU 310012, CHINA; 2.THE PEOPLE′S PROCURATORATE OF ZHEJIANG PROVINCE, HANGZHOU 310012, CHINA; 3.THE PEOPLE′S PROCURATORATE OF LISHUI, LISHUI 313000, CHINA)   

  • Online:2006-08-25 Published:2006-08-28

被引次数

10

摘要： 分析了1996￣2005年间某地区因静脉给药引起过敏性休克死亡并经尸体检验的27例案件,结果显示静脉给药引起过敏性休克以速发型为主,个体诊所和非法行医者处多见,抗生素类和非抗生素类药物均可引起,部分尸体检验可不检见明确病变,说明过敏性休克的法医学鉴定应综合临床用药、临床表现以及尸体检验结果等各种因素全面综合分析判断。

关键词: 过敏性休克, 静脉注射, 法医学分析

Abstract: 27 autopsy cases died of anaphylactic shock induced by mainline during 1996～2005 were selected and analyzed. The results showed that most anaphylactic shock induced by mainline were rapid type and more easily happened in individual clinique and lawless clinique, and it could be arisen by either antibiotics or non-antibiotics. In some cases, there may be no pathologic findings by autopsy. So, all the materials must be taken into account for determination the anaphylactic shock, such as drugs, clinic symptom, autopsy findings, and so on.

Key words: anaphylactic Shock, mainline, forensic medical analysis