法医学杂志

法医学杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 338-341.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5619.2016.05.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同方法测量不规则瘢痕面积的比较

冉  聃1，李婉娟2，孙全刚2，李剑秋3，夏  晴1   

  1. （1. 司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所 上海市法医学重点实验室 上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台，上海 200063； 2. 北京市丰台区公安司法鉴定中心，北京 100071； 3. 杭州明皓司法鉴定所，浙江 杭州 310014）
  • 发布日期:2016-10-25 出版日期:2016-10-28
  • 通讯作者: 李剑秋，女，主要从事法医临床学鉴定；E-mail：2697 20350@qq.com 夏晴，男，主检法医师，主要从事法医临床学科研和鉴定工作；E-mail：xiaq@ssfjd.cn
  • 作者简介:冉聃（1987—），男，法医师，主要从事法医临床学科研和鉴定工作；E-mail：linglong_300@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费资助项目（GY2016G-2）；上海市法医学重点实验室资助项目（14DZ2270800）；上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台资助项目（16DZ2290900）

Comparision of Different Methods of Area Measurement in Irregular Scar

RAN DAN1, LI WAN-JUAN2, SUN QUAN-GANG2, LI JIAN-QIU3, XIA QING1   

  1. （1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, P.R.China, Shanghai 200063, China; 2. Forensic Judicial Appraisal Center of Fengtai District Public Security Bureau,Beijing 100071, China; 3. Hangzhou Minghao Forensic Judicial Appraisal Institute, Hangzhou 310014, China）
  • Online:2016-10-25 Published:2016-10-28

被引次数

3

摘要： 目的 对比不同测量方法在测量不规则瘢痕面积时的优缺点，以确定不规则瘢痕面积测量标准。 方法 对不规则瘢痕面积进行数字化扫描，运用坐标纸读取法、AutoCAD像素法、Photoshop套索像素法、Photoshop魔棒填充像素法及福昕PDF阅读软件测量法进行测量，从测量时间、可重复性、是否可以全程记录及是否可以溯源等方面进行比较分析。 结果 采用上述瘢痕面积测量方法的结果差异无统计学意义，但在测量时间、同一人多次重复性及多人测量可重复性上差异存在统计学意义，仅福昕PDF阅读软件可以溯源。 结论 上述方法均可应用于瘢痕测量，但是各有利弊，还需针对司法鉴定开发新的测量软件。

关键词: 法医学, 瘢痕, 面积测量

Abstract: Objective To determine a measurement standard of irregular scar area by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of different measurement methods in measuring same irregular scar area. Methods Irregular scar area was scanned by digital scanning and measured by coordinate reading method, AutoCAD pixel method, Photoshop lasso pixel method, Photoshop magic bar filled pixel method and Foxit PDF reading software, and some aspects of these methods such as measurement time, repeatability, whether could be recorded and whether could be traced were compared and analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in the scar areas by the measurement methods above. However, there was statistical difference in the measurement time and repeatability by one or multi performers and only Foxit PDF reading software could be traced back. Conclusion The methods above can be used for measuring scar area, but each one has its advantages and disadvantages. It is necessary to develop new measurement software for forensic identification.

Key words: forensic medicine, cicatrix, area measurement

中图分类号: