法医学杂志 ›› 2007, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6): 414-417.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

14岁青少年手腕骨发育的研究Ⅰ.男生骨龄标准的制定

李开;叶可;王建文;叶龙玉;张秦初;   

  1. 南京医科大学基础医学院法医学系,娄底市公安局娄星分局,南京医科大学基础医学院法医学系,娄底市卫生学校,西安交通大学医学院法医学系 江苏南京210029,湖南娄底417000,江苏南京210029,湖南娄底417000,陕西西安710061
  • 发布日期:2007-12-25 出版日期:2007-12-28

Study on Development of Hand-wrist Bone in 14 Year-old Adolescents Ⅰ:Bone Age Standard for Boys

LI KAI1, YE KE2, WANG JIAN-WEN3, YE LONG-YU3, ZHANG QIN-CHU4 (1.NANJING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY,NANJING 210029,CHINA; 2. POLICY STATION OF LOU XING, PUBLIC SECURITY BUREAU OF LOUDI, LOUDI 417000, CHINA; 3.LOUDI CARE SCHOOL, LOUDI 417000,CHINA; 4.XI'AN JIAOTONG   

  • Online:2007-12-25 Published:2007-12-28

摘要: 目的研究我国当前青少年骨发育状况,制订专用于法医学推断男性刑事责任年龄14岁的骨龄标准。方法以湖南冷水江地区青少年为对象,按照纳入标准,选取14岁±3个月的健康男性中学生103名,拍摄其左手腕部后前位X线片。选择手腕骨15个部位,按照统一标准进行观察、测量,采用最大百分比法确定发育等级标准,建立骨龄评估方法,以单盲法进行验证。结果除第一掌骨、近节第四指骨骨骺发育等级为部分闭合外,其他均为未闭合;对于第四、五掌骨和近三指骨,不足14岁组以未闭合为主,已满14岁组以部分闭合为主。各个观察部位骨骺横径宽于干骺横径。30例的验证结果准确率为80.0%。结论根据发育等级特征及测量学方法建立骨龄评估标准可行,可望得到推广。本文以刑事责任年龄14周岁为对象,制订法医学专业骨龄推断标准,并引入测量学方法,辅助推断年龄。

关键词: 法医人类学, 骨龄, 刑事责任年龄

Abstract: Objective To study the bone development in adolescents in China, and establish forensic skeletal age standard for estimation of the criminal responsible age in 14 years old male adolescents. Methods One hundred and three healthy boys aged from 13 years and 9 months to 14 years and 3 months in Lengshuijiang, Hunan, China were enrolled in this study. X-ray films of their left hand-wrist were taken dorsaventrally, and 15 selected sites on the wrist X-ray films were examined and measured under standard condition. The development grade was confirmed by maximum percentage to establish a method to estimate the bone age, which was then checked by single blind method. Results Development grade of the first metacarpal bone and the first phalanx Ⅳ was partially closed (less than 1/3), but the rest was non-closed. The cross diameters of all the osteoepiphysis were wider than that of all the diaphysis. The development grade of the fourth metacarpal bone and the fifth metacarpal bone as well as the adjacent third phalanx were different in both younger age group (<14 years, mostly non-closed) and the older age group (>14 years, mostly closed). The confirmed accuracy (in 30 boys) was 80%. Conclusion Our study seems to be feasible in establishing the estimation standard for skeletal age determination using developmental metaphysis and anthropometry. The standard may be particularly helpful in forensic practice for estimation of accurate criminal responsible age in adolescents.

Key words: forensic anthropology, bone age, age for penal responsibility