Effects of Common Anticoagulants on the Visual Characteristics of Bloodstains

doi:10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2023.431003

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effects of three common anticoagulants, ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid-K₂ （EDTA-K₂）, sodium citrate and heparin sodium, on the visual characteristics of bloodstains such as patterns and colors. Methods Freshly collected blood samples were treated with EDTA-K₂, sodium citrate and heparin sodium respectively, and bloodstain samples were prepared on two objects, acrylic plate and ceramic tile. Bloodstains without anticoagulant treatment were used as the control sample. The drying time, wetting ratio, the number of cracks, the number of fragments, the central impression area ratio and the mean gray value of bloodstains were observed and recorded. Results Anticoagulants delayed the drying process of bloodstains. At 3.5 h, the wetting ratios of EDTA-K₂-, sodium citrate- and heparin sodium-anticoagulated bloodstains on the acrylic plate were 54.80%, 56.68% and 60.60%, respectively, which were higher than that of bloodstains without anticoagulant treatment （25.70%）. Anticoagulants increased the number of cracks, the number of fragments and the central impression area ratio. The changes of these three visual characteristics were most obvious in the sodium citrate-anticoagulated bloodstains, with the crack number of 0.93/mm, the fragment number of 46, and the central impression area ratio of 48.41% after drying. Anticoagulants reduced the mean gray value of bloodstains. Among them, the sodium citrate-anticoagulated bloodstains exhibited the longest time to peak in mean gray value, reading 3.5 h. Similar changes in visual characteristics were observed on the ceramic tile. Conclusion The three commonly used anticoagulants change the visual characteristics of bloodstains. It is not recommended to use anticoagulated blood as a substitute for preparing experimental samples in bloodstain pattern analysis experiments. Based on the changes in the visual characteristics during the drying process of bloodstains, the time of bloodstain deposition can be roughly estimated, and the blood scene staged with anticoagulated blood can be identified.

Key words: forensic medicine, forensic sceneology, bloodstain, anticoagulant, visual characteristics, drying time

CLC Number:

Zun-lei QIAN, Meng-qi WU, Yu SHI. Effects of Common Anticoagulants on the Visual Characteristics of Bloodstains[J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(1): 40-47，58.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig. 1 Area demarcation of bloodstains

Fig. 2 Measurement of visual characteristic parameters of bloodstains

Tab. 1 The time ranges for the bloodstains to reach each drying stage

干燥阶段	亚克力板				瓷砖
干燥阶段	无抗凝剂	EDTA-K₂	柠檬酸钠	肝素钠	无抗凝剂	EDTA-K₂	柠檬酸钠	肝素钠
内外分界出现	0.50~0.75	0.50~1.00	0.50~0.75	0.50~1.00	0.50~0.75	0.50~0.75	0.50~1.00	0.75~1.00
内外分界线固定	2.50~3.50	3.00~3.50	3.50~4.00	3.00~3.50	3.00~3.50	3.50~4.00	4.00~4.50	3.50~4.50
完全干燥	5.00~6.00	5.50~6.00	5.50~6.50	5.50~6.50	4.00~5.00	4.50~5.50	5.50~6.50	5.00~6.00

Fig. 3 The changes of the wetting ratios over time

Fig. 4 The changes of bloodstain patterns on the acrylic plate surface over time

Fig. 5 Variation of crack numbers over time

Fig. 6 The morphology of fully dried bloodstainson the acrylic plate surface

Fig. 7 Comparison of morphological features offour bloodstain residues on the acrylic plate

Tab. 2 The central impression area ratios of fourbloodstains on acrylic plates and ceramic tiles

血迹种类	亚克力板	瓷砖
无抗凝剂	7.01±1.15	7.81±1.34
EDTA-K₂抗凝	39.46±1.44^1）	35.36±0.55^1）
柠檬酸钠抗凝	48.41±3.10^1）2）	38.76±2.92^1）
肝素钠抗凝	25.30±2.21^1）2）3）	21.51±0.98^1）2）3）

Fig. 8 The changes of the mean gray values offour bloodstains over time

References 23

1	JAMES S H， KISH P E， SUTTON T P. Principles of bloodstain pattern analysis： Theory and practice[M]. Boca Raton： CRC Press，2005：1-10.
2	钱尊磊，李响，贾振军，等. 基于Image J软件的血迹遗留时间推断研究[J].中国法医学杂志，2023，38（1）：43-47. doi：10.13618/j.issn.1001-5728.2023.01.008 .
	QIAN Z L， LI X， JIA Z J， et al. Research on bloodstain age inference based on Image J software[J]. Zhongguo Fayixue Zazhi，2023，38（1）：43-47.
3	ATTINGER D， MOORE C， DONALDSON A， et al. Fluid dynamics topics in bloodstain pattern analysis： Comparative review and research opportunities[J]. Forensic Sci Int，2013，231（1/2/3）：375-396. doi：10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.018 .
4	HOME P H， NORMAN D G， PALMER A， et al. Quantifying forensic investigations involving bloodstain pattern analysis within the UK[J]. Forensic Sci Int，2022，339：111424. doi：10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111424 .
5	LAAN N， COMPAIN C， SEYVE L， et al. The influence of coagulation on the drying dynamics of blood pools[J]. Forensic Sci Int，2019，305：110008. doi：10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110008 .
6	CHUANG C K， LIN S P， LIN Y T， et al. Effects of anticoagulants in amino acid analysis： Comparisons of heparin， EDTA， and sodium citrate in vacutainer tubes for plasma preparation[J]. Clin Chem，1998，44（5）：1052-1056.
7	BERGMANN T， LEBERECHT C， LABUDDE D. Analysis of the influence of EDTA-treated reference samples on forensic bloodstain age estimation[J]. Forensic Sci Int，2021，325：110876. doi：10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110876 .
8	KELLENI M. Anticoagulation drugs — The current state of the art[M]. London， UK： IntechOpen，2020：3-20.
9	SPARER A， SERP B， SCHWARZ L， et al. Storability of porcine blood in forensics： How far should we go?[J]. Forensic Sci Int，2020，311：110268. doi：10 .
	1016/j.forsciint.2020.110268.
10	GARCIA G C， ALVES-JÚNIOR J R F， SANTANA Á E， et al. Hematologic variables of the Arrau turtle （Podocnemis expansa） under the effects of different anticoagulants and cytologic stains[J]. Vet Clin Pathol，2021，50（2）：209-215. doi：10.1111/vcp.12960 .
11	PARSA M， HARMAND S， SEFIANE K. Mechanisms of pattern formation from dried sessile drops[J]. Adv Colloid Interface Sci，2018，254：22-47. doi：10.1016/j.cis.2018.03.007 .
12	RAMSTHALER F， KRÖLL A K， VERHOFF M， et al. Effect of anticoagulation therapy on drying times in bloodstain pattern analysis[J]. Int J Legal Med，2017，131（4）：955-961. doi：10.1007/s00414-017-1599-1 .
13	RATNOFF O D. The blood clotting mechanism and its disorders[J]. Dis Mon，1965，11（11）：1-49. doi：10.1016/s0011-5029（65）80013-x .
14	TANG C S， SHI B， LIU C， et al. Experimental characterization of shrinkage and desiccation cracking in thin clay layer[J]. Appl Clay Sci，2011，52（1/2）：69-77. doi：10.1016/j.clay.2011.01.032 .
15	CHEN R， ZHANG L， ZANG D， et al. Blood drop patterns： Formation and applications[J]. Adv Colloid Interface Sci，2016，231：1-14. doi：10.1016/j.cis.2016.01.008 .
16	PAL A， GOPE A， IANNACCHIONE G S. Hierarchical exploration of drying patterns formed in drops containing lysozyme， PBS， and liquid crystals[J]. Processes，2022，10（5）：955. doi：10.3390/pr10050955 .
17	CHOI W， SHIN J， HYUN K A， et al. Highly sensitive and accurate estimation of bloodstain age using smartphone[J]. Biosens Bioelectron，2019，130：414-419. doi：10.1016/j.bios.2018.09.017 .
18	刘小娟，杜晓琳，黄娟，等. 生物分析中溶血对检测的影响及其对策[J].中国新药与临床杂志，2017，36（4）：181-185. doi：10.14109/j.cnki.xyylc.2017.04.001 .
	LIU X J， DU X L， HUANG J， et al. Impact of hemolysis on detection in bioanalysis and its countermeasures[J]. Zhongguo Xinyao Yu Linchuang Zazhi，2017，36（4）：181-185.
19	ANNARELLI C C， FORNAZERO J， BERT J， et al. Crack patterns in drying protein solution drops[J]. Eur Phys J E，2001，5（S1）：599-603. doi：10.1007/s101890170043 .
20	BRUTIN D， SOBAC B， LOQUET B， et al. Pattern formation in drying drops of blood[J]. J Fluid Mech，2011，667：85-95. doi：10.1017/s0022112010005070 .
21	MARÍN Á G， GELDERBLOM H， LOHSE D， et al. Order-to-disorder transition in ring-shaped colloidal stains[J]. Phys Rev Lett，2011，107（8）：085502. doi：10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.085502 .
22	SOBAC B， BRUTIN D. Desiccation of a sessile drop of blood： Cracks， folds formation and delamination[J]. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp，2014，448：34-44. doi：10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.01.076 .
23	DUGYALA V R， LAMA H， SATAPATHY D K， et al. Role of particle shape anisotropy on crack formation in drying of colloidal suspension[J]. Sci Rep，2016，6：30708. doi：10.1038/srep30708 .

[1]	Ya-ning SUN, Dan-yang LI, Qing XIA, Yan GAO, Zong-shi XU, Wen-tao XIA, Hui-ming ZHOU, Xiao-meng HAN, Xiao-ying YU, Yan-liang SHENG. Frontiers and Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Research on CT Imaging Diagnosis of Rib Fractures [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(6): 593-600.
[2]	Yan GAO, Xia LIU, Fang CHEN, Xiao-ping YANG, Ze-yu WANG, Ya-ning SUN, Yan-liang SHENG, Wen-tao XIA. Comparison of NB Chirp ABR and 40 Hz AERP in Normal Hearing Adults [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(6): 559-565.
[3]	Qiong-ying ZHENG, Xue-yi FENG, Hong-xiao DENG, Jia-xin YU, Wen-jia DUAN, Zheng QIAO, Xin WANG, Wei LIU, Ke-ming YUN, Hang CHEN, Ping XIANG. Sources of Uncertainty and Influencing Factors in the Analysis of Volatile Components in Blood Using Headspace Gas Chromatography [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(6): 574-584.
[4]	Xue-yan LIU, Wei JIA, Cui-mei LIU, Zhen-dong HUA, Zhen-chuan MA, Zhi-yu LI. Qualitative Analysis of Precursor Substances of Phenyl-2-Acetone and 3，4-Methylenedioxyphenyl-2-Acetone [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(6): 566-573.
[5]	Hou-ying ZOU, Yin-lei LEI, Ruo-cheng XIA, Yan SHI, Cheng-tao LI. Exploring Microbial Detection of Psychoactive Substances in Wastewater Based on Micobiome Analysis [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(5): 468-476.
[6]	Han ZHANG, Xin HUANG, An-qi CHEN, Ji CHEN, Yan-fang LU, Jian-ye ZENG, Xiang WANG. Skin Microbiome： Expanding Dimensions and Challenges in Forensic Evidence [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(5): 443-455.
[7]	Zhi-yong LIU, Xing-chun ZHAO, Ling CHEN, Ri-ga WU, Mei-qing YUAN, Xiao-hui CHEN, Jian ZHAO, Qu-yi XU, Chang-hui LIU, Hong-yu SUN, Chao LIU. Recommendations for the Standardization of Forensic Microbiological Analysis [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(5): 482-493.
[8]	Yan GAO, Fang CHEN, Wen-tao XIA, Xiao-ping YANG, Ze-yu WANG, Ze-ren YANG, Xia LIU, Yan-liang SHENG. Research Progress of Chirp ABR and Its Application in Forensic Auditory Identification [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(4): 387-393.
[9]	Wen-yan LI, Jin-feng ZHAO, Wei-chen LIU, Shi-jing LÜ, Jia-xin ZHANG, Xu-dong ZHANG, Zhi-wen WEI, Ke-ming YUN, Chao ZHANG. Toxicokinetics of Chlorfenapyr and Its Metabolites in Rats [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(4): 380-387.
[10]	Li-xia WEI, Bo LIU, Xiao-yuan YANG, Xi ZHANG, Yi-feng LAN, Chao ZHANG, Juan JIA, Dan ZHANG, Zhi-wen WEI, Ke-ming YUN, Zhe CHEN. Detection of Ketamine and Norketamine Using an Aptamer-Functionalized Graphene Oxide Fluorescent Sensor [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(4): 326-339.
[11]	Jia-hao LI, Jiang LING, Zi-hao CAI, Zi-yuan ZHENG, Yan-jun DING. Fluorescent Probe Development for Rapid Detection of Tiletamine Based on Copper Nanozyme and Molecular Imprinting Technology [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(4): 355-363.
[12]	Zi-wen GUO, Tian-yu QIU, Yue CAO. Rapid Identification of Etomidate and Its Structural Analogues Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy and Machine Learning [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(4): 364-370.
[13]	Tai-shen HE, Zhong-jiang LÜ, Yi-ming SUN, Yu-yang LI, Yi YE, Yao LIN, Lin-chuan LIAO. Rapid Analysis of Cyanide Based on a Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe Using Gold Nanoclusters-Fluorescein [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(4): 340-347.
[14]	Meng-yao TANG, Bo-yu HUANG, Cui-mei LIU, Xue-yan LIU, Wei JIA, Zhen-dong HUA. Rapid Screening of Etomidate and Its Analogues Using a Portable Mass Spectrometer [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(4): 348-354.
[15]	Jing-chun BAO, Jing-jing ZHAO, Jiao-yong LI, Jing-hua MENG, Xiao-long WANG, Xiao-ni ZHAN, Jun YAO, Xu WU. Construction of a Competency Evaluation Model for Forensic Practitioners [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(4): 371-379.