法医学杂志

法医学杂志 ›› 2010, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 210-213.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

刑事责任能力评估工具在司法精神病鉴定中的应用

付培鑫;王靖;史天涛;胡纪念;朱明霞;   

  1. 北京市安康医院;中国政法大学证据科学研究院;
  • 发布日期:2010-06-25 出版日期:2010-06-28

The Application of Evaluation Tools for Criminal Responsibility in Forensic Psychiatric Expertise

FU PEI-XIN1,WANG JING1,SHI TIAN-TAO1,HU JI-NIAN2,ZHU MING-XIA1(1.BEIJING ANKANG HOSPITAL,BEIJING 101300,CHINA;2.EVIDENCE SCIENCE INSTITUTE,CHINA UNIVERSITY OF PO-LITICAL SCIENCE AND LAW,BEIJING 100088,CHINA)   

  • Online:2010-06-25 Published:2010-06-28

被引次数

9

摘要： 目前,我国刑事责任能力采用三分法,分为完全责任能力、限定责任能力和无责任能力。但在司法精神病鉴定工作中,由于缺乏客观标准,三者的区分尚带有较大主观性,常导致不同鉴定人对同一案例的责任能力判定存在分歧。因此,刑事责任能力的评定一直是司法精神病鉴定亟待解决的难题。本文综述了在司法精神病鉴定中使用的几种责任能力评定量表及其应用情况,认为虽然目前这类量表的信度和效度存在争议,但其对提高鉴定结果的科学性、客观性提供了一种良好思路。

关键词: 司法精神病学, 刑事责任能力, 综述[文献类型], 评估工具

Abstract: Criminal responsibility is divided into three types: full criminal responsibility,diminished criminal responsibility and criminal irresponsibility in China.In forensic psychiatric expertise,doctors often have different opinions about the responsibility in a given case because of lacking objective criteria.The evaluation of criminal responsibility is always unresolved problem in forensic psychiatric expertise.Application of these evaluation tools in forensic psychiatric expertise were reviewed in this article.The value of the tools were still controversial in the reliability and validity,but it is clear that these tools have the positive roles in ensuring the standardization and the uniformity of the forensic investigation.

Key words: forensic psychiatry, criminal responsibility, review[publication type], evaluation tool