法医学杂志

法医学杂志 ›› 2002, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 82-85.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

人体损伤鉴定标准操作一致性研究

刘鑫,彭金香,常林,张海东,狄胜利   

  1. 北京市法庭科学技术鉴定研究所,深圳市人民警察学校,北京市法庭科学技术鉴定研究所,北京市法庭科学技术鉴定研究所,北京市法庭科学技术鉴定研究所 北京100040 ,广东518053 ,北京100040 ,北京100040 ,北京100040
  • 发布日期:2002-04-25 出版日期:2002-04-28

Study on consistency of assessed results according to the Standard of Evaluated Injured Severity

LIU XIN 1 ,PENG JIN-XIANG 2 ,CHANG LIN 1 ,ET AL.(1.BEIJING INSTITUTE OF FORENSIC MEDICINE AND SCIENCE,BEIJING100040;2.SCHOOL OF THE PEOPLE'S POLICE OF SHENZHEN CITY,SHENZHEN518053)   

  • Online:2002-04-25 Published:2002-04-28

摘要： 目的研究人体损伤鉴定标准在操作方面的一致性问题,找出操作方面可能产生鉴定失真的因素。方法选择本所1998年连续的符合设定条件的102个案件,请来自不同鉴定机构的鉴定人员9人对这些案件进行评定,并对评定资料进行统计学处理,采用spss10.0软件来分析有关项目和数据。结果研究提示同一鉴定机构不同鉴定人之间鉴定分歧较小,不同鉴定机构之间的鉴定人鉴定分歧较大;鉴定工作经验和专业培训教育是减少鉴定失真的重要因素。结论人体损伤鉴定标准具有很强的专业性,准确操作与统一解释和培训以及评定人员的经验有关。

关键词: 标准, 鉴定失真, 鉴定人

Abstract: Objective To explore the consistency of assessed results according to Standard of Evaluated Injured Severity,finding out some factors that influenced appraisal conclusion.Methods102cases examined by Beijing Institute of Forensic Medicine and Science in1998were re-evaluated respectively by nine appraisers.Results The results showed that distinction of appraisal conclusion between appraisers in the same institute was small,but in different institute was big.The work experience and professional train were important to reduce errors.Conclusion Standard of Evaluated Injured Severity strong take on character of profession.Veracity of assessed injured severity is related with unitive authoritative explanation,training and experience of appraiser.

Key words: standard, error of appraisal conclusion, appraiser