法医学杂志

法医学杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 607-612.DOI: 10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2019.05.018

• 标准论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

中美视觉系统评残标准比较分析

刘瑞珏， 夏文涛   

  1. 司法鉴定科学研究院 上海市法医学重点实验室 上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台，上海 200063
  • 发布日期:2019-10-25 出版日期:2019-10-28
  • 通讯作者: 夏文涛，男，研究员，硕士研究生导师，主要从事法医临床学鉴定与研究；E-mail：xiawt@ssfjd.cn
  • 作者简介:刘瑞珏（1970—），女，主任法医师，主要从事法医临床学研究；E-mail：liurj@ssfjd.cn
  • 基金资助:
    司法部资助项目（SF20181312）；“十三五”国家重点研发计划资助项目（2016YFC0800701）；上海市法医学重点实验室资助项目（17DZ2273200）；上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台资助项目（19DZ2292700）

Comparative Analysis of Visual System Disability Evaluation Criteria between China and the United States#br#

LIU Rui-jue, XIA Wen-tao   

  1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Service Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai 200063, China
  • Online:2019-10-25 Published:2019-10-28

PDF (PC)

616

摘要： 《人体损伤致残程度分级》（以下简称《分级》）自2017年1月发布并使用，已成为当前司法鉴定实践中使用最多的标准。本文通过以《分级》为代表的国内现行伤残评定标准中视觉系统评定条款用由美国医学会发布的《永久性残损评定指南》（Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment，以下简称GEPI）的方法计算并评级。通过对比显示，《分级》中的条款与GEPI中人体失能指数有良好相关性，据此对《分级》某些条款提出修改建议，希望对国内标准条款的修订与进一步完善提供借鉴。

关键词: 法医学, 标准, 残疾鉴定, 视觉

Abstract: Gradation of Disability in Human Body Injuries （hereinafter referred to as Gradation） has been released and used since January 2017, and has become the most widely used standard in forensic science practice. This paper calculates and rates the visual system evaluation provisions of the current domestic disability evaluation criteria represented by the Gradation which used the methods of Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment （hereinafter referred to as GEPI） issued by American Medical Association （AMA）. Through comparing, a good correlation between the provisions in Gradation and whole person impairment rating index in GEPI was shown. On the basis of this, suggestions are put forward to amend some provisions of Gradation, in order to provide reference for the revision and further improvement of domestic standards and provisions.

Key words: forensic medicine, criteria, disability identification, visual