法医学杂志

法医学杂志 ›› 2006, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 361-364.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

105例凶杀案责任能力评定分析

孙毅;胡纪念;   

  1. 北京市安康医院精神病司法鉴定科,北京市安康医院精神病司法鉴定科 北京102406,北京102406
  • 发布日期:2006-10-25 出版日期:2006-10-28

Assessment of Criminal Responsibility for Perpetrators of Homicide: Analysis of 105 cases

SUN YI, HU JI-NIAN (DEPARTMENT OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY,BEIJING ANKANG HOSPITAL,BEIJING 100055,CHINA)   

  • Online:2006-10-25 Published:2006-10-28

被引次数

3

摘要： 目的探讨鉴定医生评定凶杀案例责任能力时的主要依据及影响因素。方法对总计105例凶杀案的精神病司法鉴定案例进行回顾性分析。结果无责任能力者41例(39.0%);限定责任能力者28例(26.7%);完全责任能力者36例(34.3%);与刑事责任能力的评定密切相关的因素有:凶杀行为是否由精神病理因素引起(Gamma=0.906,P=0.000),临床诊断是否为重性精神病(Gamma=0.761,P=0.000),被害人是否为家人亲属(Gamma=0.412,P=0.000)。结论从技术层面看,鉴定医生评价责任能力考虑的三个主要方面按重要性依次是:凶杀行为是否由精神病理因素引起,被鉴定人是否患有重性精神病,被害对象是否为家人亲属。

关键词: 凶杀, 司法精神病学, 司法鉴定, 责任能力

Abstract: Objective To explore the main factors that most influence the psychiatrists in the process of assessing the capacity for criminal for perpetrators of homicide. Methods 105 homicide cases were retrospectively analyzed. Results The number of cases for no responsibility, reduced responsibility and full responsibility is 41(39.0%),28(26.7%) and 36(34.3%)respectively. The assessment of capability for criminal responsibility was significantly correlated with three major factors,they are: whether the homicide was driven by psychopathological factors (Gamma=0.906,P=0.000),whether the perpetrator was suffering a severe mental disorders(Gamma=0.761, P=0.000) and, whether the victim is the perpetrator′s family member or relative (Gamma=0.412,P=0.000). Conclusion Forensic psychiatrists take three major aspects into account in their process in assessing capacity for criminal responsibility, in a descending order, they are: was the homicide driven by pathological motivation? Was the perpetrator suffering from a severe mental disorder? Was the victim a family member or stranger?

Key words: homicide, forensic psychiatry, forensic assessment, criminal responsibility