法医学杂志

法医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 606-610.DOI: 10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2022.120101

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

性自我防卫能力评定的法律契合

樊慧雨(), 李豪喆, 张钦廷()   

  1. 司法鉴定科学研究院 上海市法医学重点实验室 司法部司法鉴定重点实验室 上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台，上海 200063
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-06 发布日期:2022-10-25 出版日期:2022-10-28
  • 通讯作者: 张钦廷
  • 作者简介:张钦廷，男，博士，主任法医师，主要从事法医精神病学研究；E-mail：zhangqinting@126.com
    樊慧雨（1987—），女，硕士，主检法医师，主要从事法医精神病鉴定及研究；E-mail：gnfhy-123@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海市“科技创新行动计划”社会发展科技攻关资助项目(20DZ1200300);上海市法医学重点实验室资助项目(21DZ2270800);司法部司法鉴定重点实验室资助项目;上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台资助项目

The Legal Correspondence of Sexual Self-Defense Capability Assessment

Hui-yu FAN(), Hao-zhe LI, Qing-ting ZHANG()   

  1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Key Laboratory of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, Shanghai Forensic Service Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai 200063, China
  • Received:2022-01-06 Online:2022-10-25 Published:2022-10-28
  • Contact: Qing-ting ZHANG

RichHTML

22

PDF (PC)

466

摘要：

目的 了解性自我防卫能力鉴定意见的法律适用及案件处置情况，探析性自我防卫能力评定法律契合的必要性。 方法 根据自制调查表，通过电话回访调查及查阅案例裁判信息，统计司法鉴定科学研究院于2012年1月1日—2018年12月31日鉴定完成的性自我防卫能力评定案件的处理情况。 结果 69例案例中，完全性自我防卫能力3例（4.3%），性防卫能力削弱30例（43.5%），无性自我防卫能力32例（46.2%），不宜评定4例（5.8%）。30例被评定为性自我防卫能力削弱者中，15例被公安机关以强奸罪立案侦查，15例未被公安机关以强奸罪立案侦查，处理不一致比例为1∶1；被公安机关以强奸罪立案侦查的案件中，10例由检察院批捕起诉，被法院判处有期徒刑，其余5例未被检察院批捕起诉，处理不一致比例达2∶1。 结论 性自我防卫能力削弱鉴定意见法律适用不一致，司法处置混乱，性自我防卫能力等级划分与法律要求进行统一、契合势在必行。

关键词: 法医精神病学, 司法鉴定, 精神障碍, 性自我防卫能力, 等级划分, 法律, 契合

Abstract:

Objective To understand the legal application and case deposition of assessment opinions of sexual self-defense capability, and to explore the necessity of legal correspondence in the sexual defense capability assessment. Methods According to the self-made questionnaire, the cases of sexual self-defense capability assessment completed by the Academy of Forensic Science from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018 were statistically analyzed through telephone interviews and referrals. Results Among the 69 cases, 3 cases （4.3%） had complete sexual self-defense capability, 30 cases （43.5%） had weakened sexual self-defense capability, 32 cases （46.2%） had no sexual self-defense capability, and 4 cases （5.8%） were not suitable for assessment. Among the 30 cases with weakened sexual self-defense ability, 15 cases were filed and investigated by public security authorities for rape and 15 cases were not. The inconsistent rate of disposition was 1∶1. Among the 15 rape cases filed and investigated by the public security authorities, 10 cases were arrested and prosecuted by the procuratorate and sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment by the court, while the other 5 cases were not arrested and prosecuted by the procuratorate, with an inconsistent rate of disposition being 2∶1. Conclusion The legal application of the assessment opinion on the weakening of sexual self-defense capability is inconsistent, and the judicial disposition is confusing. It is imperative to unify and correspond the classification of sexual self-defense capability with the legal requirements.

Key words: forensic psychiatry, judicial expertise, mental disorders, sexual self-defense capacity, classification, law, agreement

中图分类号: