法医学杂志

法医学杂志 ›› 2007, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 101-104.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

酒精相关违法行为的犯罪学特点分析

张东军;林勇;毛远毅;胡泽卿;   

  1. 四川大学基础医学与法医学院法医精神病学教研室,四川大学基础医学与法医学院法医精神病学教研室,四川大学基础医学与法医学院法医精神病学教研室,四川大学基础医学与法医学院法医精神病学教研室,四川大学华西医院心理卫生中心 四川成都610041,,四川成都610041,四川成都610041,四川成都610041,四川成都610041
  • 发布日期:2007-04-25 出版日期:2007-04-28

A Study on Characteristics of the Criminals with Alcohol-related Offence in Forensic Psychiatry

ZHANG DONG-JUN1,LIN YONG1,MAO YUAN-YI1,HU ZE-QING1,2(1.DEPARTMENT OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY,WEST CHINA SCHOOL OF PRECLINICAL AND FORENSIC MEDICINE,SICHUAN UNIVERSITY,CHENGDU 610041,CHINA;2.MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF WEST CHINA HOSPITAL,SICHUAN UNIVERSITY,CHENGD   

  • Online:2007-04-25 Published:2007-04-28

被引次数

7

摘要： 目的探讨法医精神病学鉴定中两种酒精相关违法行为的犯罪学特征。方法采用自行编制的法医精神病学鉴定案例登记表,对符合本研究纳入标准的90名被鉴定人分为普通醉酒(63例)和慢性酒精中毒(27例)两组,采用统计描述和对照研究的方法进行分析。结果普通醉酒组54.0%的案前有诱发事件,慢性酒精中毒组案前有诱发事件的为22.2%;58.7%普通醉酒组作案是临时确定的作案动机,55.6%慢性酒精中毒组无明显的作案动机;66.6%普通醉酒组是临时确定的作案目标,51.8%慢性酒精中毒组无明确的作案目标。普通醉酒组19.0%对作案时间做出了选择,慢性酒精中毒组织有3.7%选择了作案时间;普通醉酒组61.9%的案后有一定的反侦查手段,慢性酒精中毒组则是有59.3%案后停留现场。普通醉酒组98.4%被评为有刑事责任能力,慢性酒精中毒组仅3.7%被评为有刑事责任能力。结论普通醉酒组案前有诱发事件和作案动机的要高于慢性酒精中毒组,慢性酒精中毒组在案中和案后更多地缺乏自我保护意识。普通醉酒组更多地被评为有刑事责任能力,慢性酒精中毒组则多被评为部分刑事责任能力或无刑事责任能力。

关键词: 酒精, 犯罪, 法医精神病学, 犯罪学特征

Abstract: Objective To explore the criminal characteristics of alcohol-related offence in forensic psychiatric practice.Methods Ninety cases were collected according to our research criteria and were divided into two groups,ordinary drinking(OD) (63 cases) and chronic alcoholic(CA) (27 cases) .Descriptive and comparative studies were conducted between the two groups.Results 54.0% OD group had induced incident compare with 22.2% CA group;58.7% of OD group had a motive while 55.6% of CA group were with no clear motive;66.6% of OD group had a chosen target,51.8% of CA group with no clear target;19.0% of OD group chose criminal time while only 3.7% of CA group did;61.9% of OD took certain anti-detection means while 59.3% of CA group stayed at the scene.98.4% of OD group was found guilty and only 3.7% of CA was found guilty.Conclusion OD group tends to have induced events,criminal motive,often are found to be guilty;CA group tends to be older,lacks awareness of self-protection during and after committing the crime,and usually is found not guilty or only partially responsible.

Key words: alcohol, crime, forensic psychiatry, criminological characteristics