法医学杂志

法医学杂志 ›› 2011, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 208-210.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5619.2011.03.014

• 学术争鸣 • 上一篇    下一篇

“最好矫正日常生活视力”在司法鉴定中的意义

刘瑞珏   

  1. （司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所 上海市法医学重点实验室，上海 200063）
  • 发布日期:2011-06-25 出版日期:2011-06-28
  • 作者简介:刘瑞珏（1970—），女，硕士，副主任法医师，主要从事法医临床学鉴定以及眼损伤与视觉功能障碍法医学鉴定的研究；E-mail：liurj@ssfjd.cn

The Best Corrected Presenting Distance Visual Acuity in Forensic Medicine

LIU RUI-JUE   

  1. （Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, P.R.China, Shanghai 200063, China）
  • Online:2011-06-25 Published:2011-06-28

摘要： 目前我国法医学鉴定实践中有关视力障碍的评价主要是以WHO防盲研究小组于1973年制定的疾病分级标准为依据，所考察的是“最好矫正视力”。有时最好矫正视力与日常生活中实际使用的视力可能不一致。WHO于2003年新制定的盲及视力损害分类标准，提出用“日常生活视力”取代“最好矫正视力”。在司法鉴定实践中由于伤者的夸大或伪装，“日常生活视力”往往不能反映伤者的真实视力。笔者提出，由鉴定人在“日常生活视力”的基础上评估其“最好矫正日常生活视力”，可有助于更公正地进行视功能评定。

关键词: 司法鉴定, 视力, 低, 日常生活活动, 最好矫正视力

Abstract: At present the sight impairment evaluation in forensic medicine of China is based on the international classification of disease by WHO in 1973. The main measured indicator is “best corrected visual acuity”. It is different from “presenting distance visual acuity” in some situations. In the new blindness and vision loss classification made by WHO in 2003, “presenting distance visual acuity” took the place of the “best corrected visual acuity”. In the practice of forensic medicine, “presenting distance visual acuity” can not reflect the real visual acuity duo to the exaggeration or disguise of the wounded. We suggest to use “the best corrected presenting distance visual acuity” instead of “presenting distance visual acuity” in order to avoid the influences of the exaggeration or disguise of the wounded.

Key words: expert testimony, vision, low, activities of daily living, best corrected visual acuity

中图分类号: