法医学杂志

法医学杂志 ›› 2009, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 127-129.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

146例体表损伤类型与致伤物分析

陈旺根;汪枫;   

  1. 福建宗证司法鉴定所;皖南医学院医学三系;
  • 发布日期:2009-04-25 出版日期:2009-04-28

Analysis on the Characters of Injuries in Body Surface and Deduction of Injurycausing Instruments in 146 Cases

CHEN WANG-GEN1, WANG FENG2 (1. FUJIAN ZONGZHENG FORENSIC JUDICIAL APPRAISAL INSTITUTE, FUZHOU 363100, CHINA; 2. FORENSIC SCIENCE SPECIALTY, THE THIRD MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, WANNAN MEDICAL COLLEGE, WUHU 241001, CHINA)   

  • Online:2009-04-25 Published:2009-04-28

被引次数

2

摘要： 目的探讨致伤物推断的法医学鉴定及其鉴定意见的证据价值。方法收集1998—2007年间皖南医学院司法鉴定中心受理的致伤物推断案件146例,通过人体体表损伤特征的分析,推断致伤物。并通过推断致伤物与实际致伤物的比较,分析致伤物推断的准确性。结果根据锐器伤推断致伤物的准确性要比根据钝器伤推断致伤物的准确性高。结论致伤物推断结果尚存在一定的不确定性,必须结合其他证据,才能作为定案的依据。

关键词: 法医病理学, 创伤和损伤, 创伤, 非贯通性, 锐器伤, 致伤物推断

Abstract: Objective To study the deduction of injury-causing instruments and its value as judicial evidence. Methods To collect 146 cases involved in injury-causing instruments deduction, which accepted by Judicial Appraisal Center of Wannan Medical College during the period from 1998 to 2007, then to deduce the instrument by analyzing the characters of injuries in body surface. The accuracy of those deductions was evaluated by comparing the deduced instruments with the actual instruments. Results The deduction from sharp injuries was more accurate than that from blunt injuries. Conclusion Sometimes the result of deduction about injury-causing instruments are uncertain, it may be accepted as judicial evidence when supported by other evidences.

Key words: forensic pathology, wounds and injuries, wounds, nonpenetrating, sharp instrument injury, deduction of injury implements