法医学杂志

法医学杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 32-35.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5619.2012.01.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

暴力危险量表中文版的信度

章雪利1，2，谌霞灿1，蔡伟雄3，胡峻梅1，2   

  1. （1． 四川大学华西基础医学与法医学院法医精神病学教研室，四川 成都 610041； 2. 宁波市第一医院，浙江 宁波 315010； 3. 司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所 上海市法医学重点实验室，上海 200063）
  • 发布日期:2012-02-25 出版日期:2012-02-28
  • 通讯作者: 通信作者：胡峻梅，女，教授，主要从事法医精神病学研究；E-mail：junmeihu@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:章雪利（1984—），女，浙江宁波人，硕士研究生，主要从事司法精神病学研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目（81072513）；上海市法医学重点实验室开放课题基金资助项目（KF0909）

Reliability of the Violence Risk Scale of Chinese Version

ZHANG XUE-LI1,2, CHEN XIA-CAN1, CAI WEI-XIONG3, HU JUN-MEI1,2   

  1. （1. Department of Forensic Psychiatry, West China School of Preclinical and Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 2. Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo 315010, China; 3. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, P.R.China, Shanghai 200063, China）
  • Online:2012-02-25 Published:2012-02-28

被引次数

16

摘要： 目的 引入、修订具有评估暴力危险及危险变化的暴力危险量表（Violence Risk Scale，VRS），对修订后的暴力危险量表中文版（VRS-C）进行信度检验。 方法 通过标准的翻译程序形成VRS-C，3位评估者独立评估14个案例以检验评分者信度，以125例来自成都安康医院监管病区、四川华西法医学鉴定中心法医精神病学教研室及华西心理卫生中心的精神疾病患者为被试，对VRS-C的信度进行检验。 结果 初步修订的VRS-C具有较好的评分者信度（ICC=0.80）、同质性信度（克朗巴赫?琢系数=0.921）、分半信度（0.906）及题总相关性（0.246～0.849）。 结论 初步修订的VRS-C具有较好的信度。

关键词: 司法精神病学, 危险性评估, 暴力危险量表, 信度

Abstract: Objective To introduce and revise the Violence Risk Scale（VRS） for assessing violence risk and risk change, and to examine the reliability of Violence Risk Scale of Chinese version（VRS-C）. Methods The original English version of the VRS was translated into Chinese according to established translation procedures. To examine the scorer reliability the 14 cases assessed by 3 assessors separately. One hundred and twenty-five patients with mental disorders from 3 different institutions in Sichuan province （Refined Control Ward in Ankang Hospital, Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Forensic Science and Mental Health Center of West China Hospital） were collected to examine the reliability of VRS-C. Results The results showed moderately good scale reliability of the VRS-C, with 0.80 of ICC for scorer reliability. All items have significant consistence with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient as 0.921, split-half reliability as 0.906 and item total correlation as 0.246-0.849. Conclusion The reliability of the VRS-C version is acceptable.

Key words: forensic psychiatry, risk assessment, violence risk scale, reliability

中图分类号: