法医学杂志

法医学杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 293-298.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5619.2012.04.013

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

精神障碍者受审能力标准化评定研究进展

陈晓冰1，2，蔡伟雄2   

  1. 1. 苏州大学医学部法医学系，江苏 苏州 215123； 2. 司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所 上海市法医学重点实验室，上海 200063
  • 发布日期:2012-08-25 出版日期:2012-08-28
  • 通讯作者: 蔡伟雄，男，博士，主任法医师，硕士研究生导师，主要从事司法精神病学鉴定与研究；E-mail：tsaise@163.com
  • 作者简介:陈晓冰（1985—），女，湖南常德人，硕士研究生，主要从事司法精神病学研究；E-mail：icygreenbing@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:

    科研院所社会公益研究专项（GY0904）；上海市法医学重点实验室资助项目（11DZ2271500）

Progress in Standard Assessment on Competency to Stand Trial of Mentally Disordered Offenders

CHEN XIAO-BING1,2, CAI WEI-XIONG2   

  1. 1. Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China; 2. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, P.R.China, Shanghai 200063, China
  • Online:2012-08-25 Published:2012-08-28

被引次数

5

摘要： 受审能力直接关系着患精神障碍的刑事案件犯罪嫌疑人或被告人的合法权益及刑事诉讼程序的顺利进行，国外学者对此进行了大量理论研究，并研制出一批标准化的评定工具。既往我国评定多侧重医学要件，依赖经验式判断，近年来已逐渐开展受审能力及标准化评定的初步探讨。本文从受审能力的概念、判定标准、国内外评定工具研究进展三方面进行综述，其中国外相关评定工具重点从核查表、自评量表、完成句子，非定式交谈量表，定式交谈量表三分类展开，以期对精神障碍者受审能力评定量表的进一步研究及标准化有所帮助。

关键词: 司法精神病学, 精神障碍, 综述[文献类型], 受审能力

Abstract: Competency to stand trial relates directly to legal rights of the appraised individual as well as whether criminal procedure can be carried out smoothly. Foreign scholars have conducted a large number of theoretical researches, and developed a series of standardized evaluation tools. However, the assessment on competency to stand trial has mainly focused on medical criteria in China for a long time, and most cases were judged by forensic psychiatrists’ experience. Recently, Chinese scholars have started the initial research on standardized evaluation. This paper reviews the notion of competency to stand trial, the evaluation criteria, and the assessment tools domestically and abroad. The main focus is on foreign assessment tools, which included three categories. First category includes checklist, self-report questionnaires and sentence-completion tasks. Second category is the interview-based instruments without criterion-based scoring. Last category is the interview-based instruments with criterion-based scoring. This literature may be helpful for further research and standardization on assessment tools of competency to stand trial of mentally disordered offenders.

Key words: forensic psychiatry, mental disorders, review[publication type], competency to stand trial

中图分类号: