法医学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 848-851.DOI: 10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2020.06.015

• 教育与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

医疗费合理性的法医学鉴定探讨

寇兴华,梁锋,马长跃   

  1. 北京华夏物证鉴定中心,北京 100089
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-02 发布日期:2020-12-25 出版日期:2020-12-28
  • 作者简介:寇兴华(1988—),女,主检法医师,主要从事法医临床学和法医病理学研究;E-mail:453029684@qq.com

Discussion on Forensic Identification of the Rationality of Medical Expense

KOU Xing-hua, LIANG Feng, MA Chang-yue   

  1. Beijing Huaxia Evidence Identification Center, Beijing 100089, China
  • Received:2019-04-02 Online:2020-12-25 Published:2020-12-28

摘要: 在人身损害赔偿案件中,医疗费赔偿问题涉及赔偿义务人、受害方及医疗机构三方的切身利益, 医疗费合理性问题较易产生争议,但法医临床学鉴定中的医疗费合理性鉴定目前并无统一的标准和规范, 故在司法鉴定实践中容易出现鉴定意见的混乱,并可能侵犯当事人的合法权益,从而影响司法鉴定的公正 性及权威性。本文主要从医疗费及医疗费合理性的概念以及医疗费合理性争议产生的原因入手,提出进 行医疗费合理性鉴定应该遵循的基本原则,以供同行参考。

关键词: 法医学;司法鉴定;费用, 医疗;合理用药;补偿和赔偿

Abstract: In cases on compensation for personal injury, the issue of medical expense compensation involves the vital interests of the compensation obligor, the injured party and the medical institution. The rationality of medical expenses is likely to be controversial, however, there is no unified standard and stipulation for the medical expense rationality identification in forensic clinical identification at present, therefore, in the practice of judicial expertise, expert opinions easily become confused, and the legitimate rights of the parties could be infringed, which affects the impartiality and authority of judicial expertise. This article starts with the concept of medical expense and the rationality of medical expense and the reasons for disputes over the rationality of medical expense, to put forward the basic principles that should be followed in the identification of rationality of medical expenses, for peer reference.

Key words: forensic medicine, expert testimony, fees, medical, rational use of drug, compensation and redress

中图分类号: