法医学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 72-82.DOI: 10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2021.510604
王紫薇1,2(
), 徐倩南1,3, 李成涛1(
), 刘希玲1(
)
收稿日期:2021-06-29
发布日期:2023-02-25
出版日期:2023-02-28
通讯作者:
李成涛,刘希玲
作者简介:刘希玲,女,副研究员,硕士研究生导师,主要从事法医遗传学研究;E-mail:liuxl@ssfjd.cn基金资助:
Zi-wei WANG1,2(
), Qian-nan XU1,3, Cheng-tao LI1(
), Xi-ling LIU1(
)
Received:2021-06-29
Online:2023-02-25
Published:2023-02-28
Contact:
Cheng-tao LI,Xi-ling LIU
摘要:
随着DNA甲基化检测技术的发展,年龄相关甲基化修饰位点的研究发现了更多跨组织的年龄特异性位点,这使得个体年龄推断的灵敏度和准确性都有了提高。此外,各种统计模型的建立,也为不同来源组织的年龄推断提供了新的方向。本文从检测技术、年龄相关胞嘧啶鸟嘌呤二核苷酸位点和模型的选择等方面,对近年来DNA甲基化位点年龄推断的相关研究进行综述。
中图分类号:
王紫薇, 徐倩南, 李成涛, 刘希玲. DNA甲基化年龄推断及其在法医学中的应用展望[J]. 法医学杂志, 2023, 39(1): 72-82.
Zi-wei WANG, Qian-nan XU, Cheng-tao LI, Xi-ling LIU. Age Estimation Based on DNA Methylation and Its Application Prospects in Forensic Medicine[J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2023, 39(1): 72-82.
| 技术 | 血液 | 唾液 | 精液 | 月经血 | 阴道分泌物 | 参考文献 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infinium? HumanMethylation450K | cg08792630 cg06379435 | cg26107890 cg20691722 | cg17610929 cg23521140 | - | cg26107890 cg20691722 | [ |
| Infinium? HumanMethylation450K、SNaPshot、焦磷酸测序 | cg06379435 cg08792630 | cg09652652-2d | cg17610929 cg26763284 | cg09696411 cg18069290 | cg26079753-7d cg09765089-231d | [ |
| Infinium? HumanMethylation27、Infinium? HumanMethylation450K、甲基化敏感性单核苷酸引物延伸、二代测序技术 | cg26285698 cg03363565 | cg21597595 cg15227982 | cg22407458 cg05656364 | cg09696411 | cg14991487 cg03874199 | [ |
表1 不同体液中的年龄相关DNA甲基化位点
Tab. 1 Age-related CpG in different body fluids
| 技术 | 血液 | 唾液 | 精液 | 月经血 | 阴道分泌物 | 参考文献 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infinium? HumanMethylation450K | cg08792630 cg06379435 | cg26107890 cg20691722 | cg17610929 cg23521140 | - | cg26107890 cg20691722 | [ |
| Infinium? HumanMethylation450K、SNaPshot、焦磷酸测序 | cg06379435 cg08792630 | cg09652652-2d | cg17610929 cg26763284 | cg09696411 cg18069290 | cg26079753-7d cg09765089-231d | [ |
| Infinium? HumanMethylation27、Infinium? HumanMethylation450K、甲基化敏感性单核苷酸引物延伸、二代测序技术 | cg26285698 cg03363565 | cg21597595 cg15227982 | cg22407458 cg05656364 | cg09696411 | cg14991487 cg03874199 | [ |
| 时间 | 样本量/例 | 检材 | 年龄/岁 | 方法 | 模型 | 误差 | 参考文献 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018年 | 390 | 血液 | 15~75 | EpiTYPER、 焦磷酸测序 | 多元线性回归 | R2=0.92,MAD=2.89 | [ |
| 支持向量机 | R2=0.92,MAD=2.91 | ||||||
| 人工神经网络 | R2=0.92,MAD=2.71 | ||||||
| 2018年 | 110 | 血液 | 11~93 | MPS | 支持向量机 | RMSE=4.9,MAE=4.1 | [ |
| 2019年 | 95 | 唾液 | 18~65 | MPS | 人工神经网络 | MAPE=8.89%,MAD=3.19 | [ |
| SNaPshot | 多元线性回归 | MAPE=10.44%,MAD=3.69 | |||||
| 2020年 | 310 | 血液 | 2~86 | SNaPshot | 逐步线性回归 | R2=0.85,MAD=4.22 | [ |
| 支持向量回归 | R2=0.86,MAD=4.01 | ||||||
| 2021年 | 141 | 口腔拭子 | 21~69 | 焦磷酸测序、微测序 | 逐步线性回归 | MAD1=5.16,MAD2=6.44 | [ |
| 2022年 | 240 | 血液 | 1~81 | 焦磷酸测序 | 逐步线性回归 | RMSE=3.89,MAD=2.97 | [ |
| 支持向量回归 | RMSE=2.95,MAD=2.22 | ||||||
| 随机森林回归 | RMSE=1.77,MAD=1.29 | ||||||
| 2022年 | 529 | 血液 | 2~82 | SNaPshot | 逐步线性回归 | R2=0.923,MAE=3.52 | [ |
| 支持向量回归 | R2=0.935,MAE=2.88 |
表2 部分年龄推断研究相关信息统计
Tab. 2 Summary of some relevant information about age determination model
| 时间 | 样本量/例 | 检材 | 年龄/岁 | 方法 | 模型 | 误差 | 参考文献 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018年 | 390 | 血液 | 15~75 | EpiTYPER、 焦磷酸测序 | 多元线性回归 | R2=0.92,MAD=2.89 | [ |
| 支持向量机 | R2=0.92,MAD=2.91 | ||||||
| 人工神经网络 | R2=0.92,MAD=2.71 | ||||||
| 2018年 | 110 | 血液 | 11~93 | MPS | 支持向量机 | RMSE=4.9,MAE=4.1 | [ |
| 2019年 | 95 | 唾液 | 18~65 | MPS | 人工神经网络 | MAPE=8.89%,MAD=3.19 | [ |
| SNaPshot | 多元线性回归 | MAPE=10.44%,MAD=3.69 | |||||
| 2020年 | 310 | 血液 | 2~86 | SNaPshot | 逐步线性回归 | R2=0.85,MAD=4.22 | [ |
| 支持向量回归 | R2=0.86,MAD=4.01 | ||||||
| 2021年 | 141 | 口腔拭子 | 21~69 | 焦磷酸测序、微测序 | 逐步线性回归 | MAD1=5.16,MAD2=6.44 | [ |
| 2022年 | 240 | 血液 | 1~81 | 焦磷酸测序 | 逐步线性回归 | RMSE=3.89,MAD=2.97 | [ |
| 支持向量回归 | RMSE=2.95,MAD=2.22 | ||||||
| 随机森林回归 | RMSE=1.77,MAD=1.29 | ||||||
| 2022年 | 529 | 血液 | 2~82 | SNaPshot | 逐步线性回归 | R2=0.923,MAE=3.52 | [ |
| 支持向量回归 | R2=0.935,MAE=2.88 |
| 1 | SALAMEH Y, BEJAOUI Y, HAJJ N EL. DNA methylation biomarkers in aging and age-related diseases[J]. Front Genet,2020,11:171. doi:10.3389/fgene.2020. 00171 . |
| 2 | VIDAKI A, KAYSER M. From forensic epigenetics to forensic epigenomics: Broadening DNA investigative intelligence[J]. Genome Biol,2017,18(1):238. doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1373-1 . |
| 3 | OSORIO F G, VARELA I, LARA E, et al. Nuclear envelope alterations generate an aging-like epigenetic pattern in mice deficient in Zmpste24 metalloprotease[J]. Aging Cell,2010,9(6):947-957. doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00621.x . |
| 4 | POLLINA E A, BRUNET A. Epigenetic regulation of aging stem cells[J]. Oncogene,2011,30(28):3105-3126. doi:10.1038/onc.2011.45 . |
| 5 | FRAGA M F, ESTELLER M. Epigenetics and aging: The targets and the marks[J]. Trends Genet,2007,23(8):413-418. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2007.05.008 . |
| 6 | VIDAKI A, DÍEZ LÓPEZ C, CARNERO-MONTORO E, et al. Epigenetic discrimination of identical twins from blood under the forensic scenario[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2017,31:67-80. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.07.014 . |
| 7 | VIDAKI A, KALAMARA V, CARNERO-MONTORO E, et al. Investigating the epigenetic discrimination of identical twins using buccal swabs, saliva, and cigarette butts in the forensic setting[J]. Genes,2018,9(5):252. doi:10.3390/genes9050252 . |
| 8 | 徐倩南,李成涛,刘希玲. 同卵双生子甄别研究进展[J].法医学杂志,2018,34(6):672-677. doi:10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2018.06.020 . |
| XU Q N, LI C T, LIU X L. Research progress on discrimination of monozygotic twins[J]. Fayixue Zazhi,2018,34(6):672-677. | |
| 9 | VANYUSHIN B F, NEMIROVSKY L E, KLIMEN-KO V V, et al. The 5-methylcytosine in DNA of rats. Tissue and age specificity and the changes induced by hydrocortisone and other agents[J]. Gerontologia,1973,19(3):138-152. |
| 10 | LYONS M J, YORK T P, FRANZ C E, et al. Genes determine stability and the environment determines change in cognitive ability during 35 years of adulthood[J]. Psychol Sci,2009,20(9):1146-1152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02425.x . |
| 11 | GREENWOOD T A, BEERI M S, SCHMEI-DLER J, et al. Heritability of cognitive functions in families of successful cognitive aging probands from the Central Valley of Costa Rica[J]. J Alzheimers Dis,2011,27(4):897-907. doi:10.3233/JAD-2011-110782 . |
| 12 | CASTILLO-FERNANDEZ J E, SPECTOR T D, BELL J T. Epigenetics of discordant monozygotic twins: Implications for disease[J]. Genome Med,2014,6(7):60. doi:10.1186/s13073-014-0060-z . |
| 13 | ISSA J P. Aging and epigenetic drift: A vicious cycle[J]. J Clin Invest,2014,124(1):24-29. doi:10.1172/jci69735 . |
| 14 | MAEGAWA S, HINKAL G, KIM H S, et al. Widespread and tissue specific age-related DNA methylation changes in mice[J]. Genome Res,2010,20(3):332-340. doi:10.1101/gr.096826.109 . |
| 15 | VIDAKI A, BALLARD D, ALIFERI A, et al. DNA methylation-based forensic age prediction using artificial neural networks and next generation sequencing[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2017,28:225-236. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.02.009 . |
| 16 | NAUE J, SÄNGER T, HOEFSLOOT H C J, et al. Proof of concept study of age-dependent DNA methylation markers across different tissues by massive parallel sequencing[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2018,36:152-159. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.007 . |
| 17 | ATSEM S, REICHENBACH J, POTABATTULA R, et al. Paternal age effects on sperm FOXK1 and KCNA7 methylation and transmission into the next generation[J]. Hum Mol Genet,2016,25(22):4996-5005. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddw328 . |
| 18 | POTABATTULA R, DITTRICH M, BÖCK J, et al. Allele-specific methylation of imprinted genes in fetal cord blood is influenced by cis-acting genetic variants and parental factors[J]. Epigenomics,2018,10(10):1315-1326. doi:10.2217/epi-2018-0059 . |
| 19 | BARROS-SILVA D, MARQUES C J, HENRIQUE R, et al. Profiling DNA methylation based on next-generation sequencing approaches: New insights and clinical applications[J]. Genes,2018,9(9):429. doi:10.3390/genes9090429 . |
| 20 | HOLMES E E, JUNG M, MELLER S, et al. Performance evaluation of kits for bisulfite-conversion of DNA from tissues, cell lines, FFPE tissues, aspirates, lavages, effusions, plasma, serum, and urine[J]. PLoS One,2014,9(4): e93933. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093933 . |
| 21 | ZBIEĆ-PIEKARSKA R, SPÓLNICKA M, KUPIEC T, et al. Development of a forensically useful age prediction method based on DNA methylation analysis[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2015,17:173-179. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.05.001 . |
| 22 | JUNG S E, LIM S M, HONG S R, et al. DNA methylation of the ELOVL2, FHL2, KLF14, C1orf132/MIR29B2C, and TRIM59 genes for age prediction from blood, saliva, and buccal swab samples[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2019,38:1-8. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.09.010 . |
| 23 | FREIRE-ARADAS A, PHILLIPS C, MOSQUERA-MIGUEL A, et al. Development of a methylation marker set for forensic age estimation using analysis of public methylation data and the Agena Bioscience EpiTYPER system[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2016,24:65-74. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.06.005 . |
| 24 | FREIRE-ARADAS A, PHILLIPS C, GIRÓN-SANTAMARÍA L, et al. Tracking age-correlated DNA methylation markers in the young[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2018,36:50-59. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.06.011 . |
| 25 | HAMANO Y, MANABE S, MORIMOTO C, et al. Forensic age prediction for dead or living samples by use of methylation-sensitive high resolution melting[J]. Leg Med (Tokyo),2016,21:5-10. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2016.05.001 . |
| 26 | SANDOVAL J, HEYN H, MORAN S, et al. Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 450 000 CpG sites in the human genome[J]. Epigenetics,2011,6(6):692-702. doi:10.4161/epi.6.6.16196 . |
| 27 | ALIFERI A, BALLARD D, GALLIDABINO M D, et al. DNA methylation-based age prediction using massively parallel sequencing data and multiple machine learning models[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2018,37:215-226. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.09.003 . |
| 28 | HONG S R, SHIN K J, JUNG S E, et al. Platform-independent models for age prediction using DNA methylation data[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2019,38:39-47. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.10.005 . |
| 29 | FENG L, PENG F D, LI S F, et al. Systematic feature selection improves accuracy of methylation-based forensic age estimation in Han Chinese males[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2018,35:38-45. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.03.009 . |
| 30 | AHUJA N, LI Q, MOHAN A L, et al. Aging and DNA methylation in colorectal mucosa and cancer[J]. Cancer Res,1998,58(23):5489-5494. |
| 31 | TESCHENDORFF A E, MENON U, GENTRY-MAHARAJ A, et al. Age-dependent DNA methylation of genes that are suppressed in stem cells is a hallmark of cancer[J]. Genome Res,2010,20(4):440-446. doi:10.1101/gr.103606.109 . |
| 32 | HERNANDEZ D G, NALLS M A, GIBBS J R, et al. Distinct DNA methylation changes highly correlated with chronological age in the human brain[J]. Hum Mol Genet,2011,20(6):1164-1172. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddq561 . |
| 33 | BELL J T, TSAI P C, YANG T P, et al. Epigenome-wide scans identify differentially methylated regions for age and age-related phenotypes in a healthy ageing population[J]. PLoS Genet,2012,8(4): e1002629. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002629 . |
| 34 | HANNUM G, GUINNEY J, ZHAO L, et al. Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates[J]. Mol Cell,2013,49(2):359-367. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016 . |
| 35 | HORVATH S. Erratum to: DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types[J]. Genome Biol,2015,16(1):96. doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0649-6 . |
| 36 | WEIDNER C I, LIN Q, KOCH C M, et al. Aging of blood can be tracked by DNA methylation changes at just three CpG sites[J]. Genome Biol,2014,15(2): R24. doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r24 . |
| 37 | SEHL M E, HENRY J E, STORNIOLO A M, et al. DNA methylation age is elevated in breast tissue of healthy women[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2017,164(1):209-219. doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4218-4 . |
| 38 | ZYKOVICH A, HUBBARD A, FLYNN J M, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation changes with age in disease-free human skeletal muscle[J]. Aging Cell,2014,13(2):360-366. doi:10.1111/acel.12180 . |
| 39 | CHEN B H, MARIONI R E, COLICINO E, et al. DNA methylation-based measures of biological age: Meta-analysis predicting time to death[J]. Aging,2016,8(9):1844-1865. doi:10.18632/aging.101020 . |
| 40 | MARIONI R E, SHAH S, MCRAE A F, et al. DNA methylation age of blood predicts all-cause mortality in later life[J]. Genome Biol,2015,16(1):25. doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0584-6 . |
| 41 | KANANEN L, MARTTILA S, NEVALAINEN T, et al. The trajectory of the blood DNA methylome ageing rate is largely set before adulthood: Evidence from two longitudinal studies[J]. Age (Dordr),2016,38(3):65. doi:10.1007/s11357-016-9927-9 . |
| 42 | SIMPKIN A J, HEMANI G, SUDERMAN M, et al. Prenatal and early life influences on epigenetic age in children: A study of mother-offspring pairs from two cohort studies[J]. Hum Mol Genet,2016,25(1):191-201. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddv456 . |
| 43 | NOREEN F, RÖÖSLI M, GAJ P, et al. Modulation of age- and cancer-associated DNA methylation change in the healthy colon by aspirin and lifestyle[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,2014,106(7): dju161. doi:10.1093/jnci/dju161 . |
| 44 | WEST J, BECK S, WANG X D, et al. An integrative network algorithm identifies age-associated differential methylation interactome hotspots targeting stem-cell differentiation pathways[J]. Sci Rep,2013,3:1630. doi:10.1038/srep01630 . |
| 45 | ALMÉN M S, NILSSON E K, JACOBSSON J A, et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals DNA methylation markers that vary with both age and obesity[J]. Gene,2014,548(1):61-67. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2014.07.009 . |
| 46 | DAY K, WAITE L L, THALACKER-MERCER A, et al. Differential DNA methylation with age displays both common and dynamic features across human tissues that are influenced by CpG landscape[J]. Genome Biol,2013,14(9): R102. doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-r102 . |
| 47 | HORVATH S, ZHANG Y F, LANGFELDER P, et al. Aging effects on DNA methylation modules in human brain and blood tissue[J]. Genome Biol,2012,13(10): R97. doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-r97 . |
| 48 | PAN C, YI S H, XIAO C, et al. The evaluation of seven age-related CpGs for forensic purpose in blood from Chinese Han population[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2020,46:102251. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102251 . |
| 49 | PARK J L, KWON O H, KIM J H, et al. Identification of body fluid-specific DNA methylation markers for use in forensic science[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2014,13:147-153. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.07.011 . |
| 50 | LEE H Y, AN J H, JUNG S E, et al. Genome-wide methylation profiling and a multiplex construction for the identification of body fluids using epigenetic markers[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2015,17:17-24. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.03.002 . |
| 51 | LEE H Y, JUNG S E, LEE E H, et al. DNA methylation profiling for a confirmatory test for blood, saliva, semen, vaginal fluid and menstrual blood[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2016,24:75-82. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.06.007 . |
| 52 | FORAT S, HUETTEL B, REINHARDT R, et al. Methylation markers for the identification of body fluids and tissues from forensic trace evidence[J]. PLoS One,2016,11(2): e0147973. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147973 . |
| 53 | SCHWENDER K, HOLLÄNDER O, KLOPFLEI-SCH S, et al. Development of two age estimation models for buccal swab samples based on 3 CpG sites analyzed with pyrosequencing and minisequencing[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2021,53:102521. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102521 . |
| 54 | HONG S R, JUNG S E, LEE E H, et al. DNA methylation-based age prediction from saliva: High age predictability by combination of 7 CpG markers[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2017,29:118-125. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.04.006 . |
| 55 | MADI T, BALAMURUGAN K, BOMBARDI R, et al. The determination of tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns in forensic biofluids using bisulfite modification and pyrosequencing[J]. Electrophoresis,2012,33(12):1736-1745. doi:10.1002/elps.201100711 . |
| 56 | SOARES BISPO SANTOS SILVA D, ANTUNES J, BALAMURUGAN K, et al. Evaluation of DNA methylation markers and their potential to predict human aging[J]. Electrophoresis,2015,36(15):1775-1780. doi:10.1002/elps.201500137 . |
| 57 | FAN H L, XIE Q Q, ZHANG Z, et al. Chronological age prediction: Developmental evaluation of DNA methylation-based machine learning models[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol,2021,9:819991. doi:10. 3389/fbioe.2021.819991 . |
| 58 | HAN X L, XIAO C, YI S H, et al. Accurate age estimation from blood samples of Han Chinese individuals using eight high-performance age-related CpG sites[J]. Int J Legal Med,2022,136(6):1655-1665. doi:10.1007/s00414-022-02865-3 . |
| 59 | XU C, QU H Z, WANG G Y, et al. A novel strategy for forensic age prediction by DNA methylation and support vector regression model[J]. Sci Rep,2015,5:17788. doi:10.1038/srep17788 . |
| 60 | SMEERS I, DECORTE R, VAN DE VOORDE W, et al. Evaluation of three statistical prediction models for forensic age prediction based on DNA methylation[J]. Forensic Sci Int Genet,2018,34:128-133. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.02.008 . |
| 61 | HOUSEMAN E A, KIM S, KELSEY K T, et al. DNA methylation in whole blood: Uses and challenges[J]. Curr Environ Health Rep,2015,2(2):145-154. doi:10.1007/s40572-015-0050-3 . |
| 62 | DICK K J, NELSON C P, TSAPROUNI L, et al. DNA methylation and body-mass index: A genome-wide analysis[J]. Lancet,2014,383(9933):1990-1998. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62674-4 . |
| 63 | TALENS R P, BOOMSMA D I, TOBI E W, et al. Variation, patterns, and temporal stability of DNA methylation: Considerations for epigenetic epidemiology[J]. FASEB J,2010,24(9):3135-3144. doi:10.1096/fj.09-150490 . |
| 64 | PURCELL M, KRUGER A, TAINSKY M A. Gene expression profiling of replicative and induced senescence[J]. Cell Cycle,2014,13(24):3927-3937. doi:10.4161/15384101.2014.973327 . |
| [1] | 王新颖, 张佳丽, 向平, 王鑫. 毛发代谢组学研究及其在法医学领域的应用进展[J]. 法医学杂志, 2026, 42(1): 49-55. |
| [2] | 孙溢华, 陈剑, 李永生. 6种STR试剂盒法医学检验性能比较[J]. 法医学杂志, 2026, 42(1): 26-33. |
| [3] | 贾琼, 靳开钧, 刘诗琪, 张祎萌, 孟运乐, 聂昊, 胡胜, 杨帆, 赵兴春, 叶健. 尸体腐败阶段分期方法体系的法医学研究进展[J]. 法医学杂志, 2026, 42(1): 34-42. |
| [4] | 牛鑫, 曹喆. 肠系膜损伤在虐待儿童案件中的法医学意义[J]. 法医学杂志, 2026, 42(1): 43-48. |
| [5] | 余华光, 黄江平, 刘亚楠, 于雷, 金晓剑. 综合运用混合分型拆分和Y-STR破获强奸致孕案1例[J]. 法医学杂志, 2025, 41(6): 612-615. |
| [6] | 孙亚宁, 李丹阳, 夏晴, 高妍, 徐宗诗, 夏文涛, 周慧明, 韩晓梦, 俞晓英, 盛延良. 人工智能技术在肋骨骨折CT影像诊断中的法医学研究前沿及展望[J]. 法医学杂志, 2025, 41(6): 593-600. |
| [7] | 刘宁国. 法医病理学的创新发展及前景展望[J]. 法医学杂志, 2025, 41(6): 517-530. |
| [8] | 赵虎. 法医精神病学的研究现状与挑战[J]. 法医学杂志, 2025, 41(6): 531-536. |
| [9] | 丁鑫泽, 林锦锋, 张轶伦, 黄佳斌, 陈云弟, 王万旭. 罕见非整倍体流产胚胎DNA检验1例[J]. 法医学杂志, 2025, 41(6): 616-619. |
| [10] | 朱波峰. 多组学视域下的精准鉴识:法医物证学研究现状、挑战与展望[J]. 法医学杂志, 2025, 41(5): 421-440. |
| [11] | 张晗, 黄馨, 陈安琪, 陈吉, 路艳芳, 曾建业, 王翔. 皮肤微生物组:拓展法医学证据维度及面临的挑战[J]. 法医学杂志, 2025, 41(5): 443-455. |
| [12] | 刘振平, 沈艳, 王胜利, 傅燕芳, 童继军, 徐倩南, 翟仙敦. Y染色体长臂多个STR等位基因缺失样本的家系分型调查3例[J]. 法医学杂志, 2025, 41(5): 513-516. |
| [13] | 高妍, 陈芳, 夏文涛, 杨小萍, 王泽宇, 杨泽人, 刘霞, 盛延良. Chirp ABR的研究进展及其在法医学听力鉴定中的应用展望[J]. 法医学杂志, 2025, 41(4): 387-393. |
| [14] | 田一鸣, 严一博, 文迪, 施妍. 新型功能材料在新精神活性物质快速检测中的研究进展[J]. 法医学杂志, 2025, 41(4): 314-325. |
| [15] | 陈冲, 石妍, 贾莉, 李惠芬, 任贺, 张京晶. Y-STR等位基因缺失关联Y染色体AZFabc亚区缺失1例[J]. 法医学杂志, 2025, 41(4): 404-406. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||