Exploring Microbial Detection of Psychoactive Substances in Wastewater Based on Micobiome Analysis

doi:10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2025.550803

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To explore the potential wastewater microbiome analysis for detecting psychoactive substances by using full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing with liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry （LC-MS/MS）. Methods LC-MS/MS was used to qualitatively detect psychoactive substances in 21 wastewater samples suspected to contain such compunds. Based on the results, the samples were categorized into two groups: a positive group （containing psychoactive substances） and a negative group （free of psychoactive substances）. Subsequently, bacterial communities in all samples were analyzed using full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing. This analysis characterized the species composition, α diversity （Shannon and Simpson indices), and β-diversity （PCoA and NMDS）. Significantly different operational taxonomic units （OTUs） were screened using linear discriminant analysis effect size （LEfSe）, and optimal OTU features were iteratively selected via recursive feature elimination （RFE）. A random forest prediction model was built with these two OTU subsets as input features. Results The composition and structure of the bacterial communities showed marked differences between the two groups. The sample diversity in the positive group was higher than that in the negative group. The permutational ultivariate analysis of variance （PERMANOVA） revealed a statistically significant difference in β-diversity between the two groups. Random Forest models achieved a prediction accuracy of 83.3%, with areas under the ROC curve of 0.89 and 0.83, respectively. Conclusion Integrating wastewater bacterial community analysis with chemical analysis techniques may provide a more comprehensive approach for monitering the presence of psychoactive substances.

Key words: forensic medicine, microbiomics, psychoactive substances, machine learning, 16S rRNA

CLC Number:

Hou-ying ZOU, Yin-lei LEI, Ruo-cheng XIA, Yan SHI, Cheng-tao LI. Exploring Microbial Detection of Psychoactive Substances in Wastewater Based on Micobiome Analysis[J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2025, 41(5): 468-476.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: http://www.fyxzz.cn/EN/10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2025.550803

http://www.fyxzz.cn/EN/Y2025/V41/I5/468

Figures/Tables 5

Fig. 1 The distribution of the top ten most abundant bacteria at the genus and species levels among groups and samples

Fig. 2 Analysis results of α-diversity

Fig. 3 The results of PCoA and NMDS analysis

Fig. 4 The results of LEfSe analysis

Fig. 5 The results of random forest model

References 47

[1]	JIN H B， YANG D， WU P F， et al. Environmental occurrence and ecological risks of psychoactive substances[J]. Environ Int，2022，158：106970. doi：10.1016/j.envint.2021.106970 .
[2]	ZAAMI S， MARINELLI E， VARÌ M R. New trends of substance abuse during COVID-19 pandemic： An international perspective[J]. Front Psychiatry，2020，11：700. doi：10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00700 .
[3]	ŚWIĄTEK S， CZYRSKI A. Analytical methods for determining psychoactive substances in various matrices： A review[J]. Crit Rev Anal Chem，2024，18：1-27. doi：10.1080/10408347.2024.2388123 .
[4]	中国国家禁毒委员会办公室. 2023年中国毒情形势报告[N].中国禁毒报，2024-06-28（3）.
	China National Narcotics Control Committee. China drug situation report 2023[N]. Zhongguo Jindu Bao，2024-06-28（3）.
[5]	MUSIAŁ J， CZARNY J， GADZAŁA-KOPCIUCH R. Overview of analytical methods for determining novel psychoactive substances， drugs and their metabolites in biological samples[J]. Crit Rev Toxicol，2022，52（3）：239-258. doi：10.1080/10408444.2022. 2091424 .
[6]	BOROVA V L， MARAGOU N C， GAGO-FERRERO P， et al. Highly sensitive determination of 68 psychoactive pharmaceuticals， illicit drugs， and related human metabolites in wastewater by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Anal Bioanal Chem，2014，406（17）：4273-4285. doi：10. 1007/s00216-014-7819-3 .
[7]	BOROVA V L， GAGO-FERRERO P， PISTOS C， et al. Multi-residue determination of 10 selected new psychoactive substances in wastewater samples by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Talanta，2015，144：592-603. doi：10.1016/j.talanta.2015. 06.080 .
[8]	CONG Z X， SHAO X T， LIU S Y， et al. Wastewater analysis reveals urban， suburban， and rural spatial patterns of illicit drug use in Dalian， China[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int，2021，28（20）：25503-25513. doi：10.1007/s11356-021-12371-5 .
[9]	TOMSONE L E， PERKONS I， SUKAJEVA V， et al. Consumption trends of pharmaceuticals and psychoactive drugs in Latvia determined by the analysis of wastewater[J]. Water Res，2022，221：118800. doi：10.1016/j.watres.2022.118800 .
[10]	SHAO X T， LIU S Y， ZHAO Y T， et al. Evaluation of eight psychoactive drugs used in Chinese cities by wastewater-based epidemiology[J]. Sci Total Environ，2023，855：158982. doi：10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2022.158982 .
[11]	CHAPPELL A， ARMSTRONG B， JAY E， et al. Illicit drug consumption estimated using wastewater analysis and compared by settlement size in New Zealand[J]. Sci Total Environ，2022，843：156956. doi：10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156956 .
[12]	GATIDOU G， KINYUA J， VAN NUIJS A L N， et al. Drugs of abuse and alcohol consumption among different groups of population on the Greek Island of Lesvos through sewage-based epidemiology[J]. Sci Total Environ，2016，563-564：633-640. doi：10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.130 .
[13]	GONÇALVES R， RIBEIRO C， CRAVO S， et al. Multi-residue method for enantioseparation of psychoactive substances and beta blockers by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry[J]. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci，2019，1125：121731. doi：10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.121731 .
[14]	VEROVŠEK T， HEATH D， HEATH E. Enantiomeric profiling of amphetamines in wastewater using chiral derivatisation with gas chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric detection[J]. Sci Total Environ，2022，835：155594. doi：10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2022.155594 .
[15]	张婷婷，黄钰，张学军，等. 污水中甲基苯丙胺干扰物N-甲基-2-苯基丙胺的结构解析[J].法医学杂志，2022，38（6）：726-732. doi：10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2022.320102 .
	ZHANG T T， HUANG Y， ZHANG X J， et al. Structure analysis of the interfering substance N-methyl-2-phenylpropan-1-amine of methamphetamine in wastewater[J]. Fayixue Zazhi，2022，38（6）：726-732.
[16]	HIDALGO K J， SAITO T， SILVA R S， et al. Microbiome taxonomic and functional profiles of two domestic sewage treatment systems[J]. Biodegradation，2021，32（1）：17-36. doi：10.1007/s10532-02 0-09921-y .
[17]	NEWTON R J， BOOTSMA M J， MORRISON H G， et al. A microbial signature approach to identify fecal pollution in the waters off an urbanized coast of Lake Michigan[J]. Microb Ecol，2013，65（4）：1011-1023. doi：10.1007/s00248-013-0200-9 .
[18]	COLAS S， MARIE B， MORIN S， et al. New sensitive tools to characterize meta-metabolome response to short- and long-term cobalt exposure in dynamic river biofilm communities[J]. Sci Total Environ，2024，927：171851. doi：10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2024.171851 .
[19]	BERG J， BRANDT K K， AL-SOUD W A， et al. Selection for Cu-tolerant bacterial communities with altered composition， but unaltered richness， via long-term Cu exposure[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol，2012，78（20）：7438-7446. doi：10.1128/AEM.01 071-12 .
[20]	PEREZ M F， SAONA L A， FARÍAS M E， et al. Assessment of the plasmidome of an extremophilic microbial community from the Diamante Lake， Argentina[J]. Sci Rep，2021，11（1）：21459. doi：10.1038/s41598-021-00753-1 .
[21]	SENGUPTA P， MUTHAMILSELVI SIVABALAN S K， SINGH N K， et al. Genomic， functional， and metabolic enhancements in multidrug-resistant Enterobacter bugandensis facilitating its persistence and succession in the International Space Station[J]. Microbiome，2024，12（1）：62. doi：10.1186/s40168-024-01777-1 .
[22]	YANG Y D， YU X， LIU X B， et al. Altered fecal microbiota composition in individuals who abuse methamphetamine[J]. Sci Rep，2021，11（1）：18178. doi：10.1038/s41598-021-97548-1 .
[23]	WANG D W， FENG Y， YANG M， et al. Variations in the oral microbiome and metabolome of methamphetamine users[J]. mSystems，2024，9（1）：e0099123. doi：10.1128/msystems.00991-23 .
[24]	EDGAR R C. UPARSE： Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads[J]. Nat Methods，2013，10（10）：996-998. doi：10.1038/nmeth.2604 .
[25]	BIJLSMA L， CELMA A， CASTIGLIONI S， et al. Monitoring psychoactive substance use at six European festivals through wastewater and pooled urine analysis[J]. Sci Total Environ，2020，725：138376. doi：10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138376 .
[26]	SULEJ-SUCHOMSKA A M， KLUPCZYNSKA A， DEREZIŃSKI P， et al. Urban wastewater analysis as an effective tool for monitoring illegal drugs， including new psychoactive substances， in the Eastern European region[J]. Sci Rep，2020，10（1）：4885. doi：10.1038/s41598-020-61628-5 .
[27]	LANGA I， GONÇALVES R， TIRITAN M E， et al. Wastewater analysis of psychoactive drugs： Non-enantioselective vs enantioselective methods for estimation of consumption[J]. Forensic Sci Int，2021，325：110873. doi：10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110873 .
[28]	HACKMANN T J. Setting new boundaries of 16S rRNA gene identity for prokaryotic taxonomy[J]. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol，2025，75（4）：006747. doi：10.1099/ijsem.0.006747 .
[29]	KISHIMOTO N， KOSAKO Y， WAKAO N， et al. Transfer of Acidiphilium facilis and Acidiphilium aminolytica to the genus Acidocella gen. nov.， and emendation of the genus Acidiphilium [J]. Syst Appl Microbiol，1995，18（1）：85-91. doi：10.1016/S0723-2020（11）80453-4 .
[30]	OKAMOTO R， KOJIMA H， FUKUI M. Acidocella aquatica sp. nov.， a novel acidophilic heterotrophic bacterium isolated from a freshwater lake[J]. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol，2017，67（11）：4773-4776. doi： 10.1099/ijsem.0.002376 .
[31]	JONES R M， HEDRICH S， JOHNSON D B. Acidocella aromatica sp. nov.： An acidophilic heterotrophic alphaproteobacterium with unusual phenotypic traits[J]. Extremophiles，2013，17（5）：841-850. doi：10.1007/s00792-013-0566-0 .
[32]	EZE M O. Metagenome analysis of a hydrocarbon-degrading bacterial consortium reveals the specific roles of BTEX biodegraders[J]. Genes（Basel），2021，12（1）：98. doi：10.3390/genes12010098 .
[33]	GOLDBERG J S. Stereochemical basis for a unified structure activity theory of aromatic and heterocyclic rings in selected opioids and opioid peptides[J]. Perspect Medicin Chem，2010，4：1-10. doi：10.4137/pmc.s3898 .
[34]	PRATIWI R， NOVIANA E， FAUZIATI R， et al. A review of analytical methods for codeine determination[J]. Molecules，2021，26（4）：800. doi：10.3390/molecules26040800 .
[35]	FELFÖLDI T， SZÉKELY A J， GORÁL R， et al. Polyphasic bacterial community analysis of an aerobic activated sludge removing phenols and thiocyanate from coke plant effluent[J]. Bioresour Technol，2010，101（10）：3406-3414. doi：10.1016/j.biortech. 2009.12.053 .
[36]	LI J B， ZHANG D Y， SONG M K， et al. Novel bacteria capable of degrading phenanthrene in activated sludge revealed by stable-isotope probing coupled with high-throughput sequencing[J]. Biodegradation，2017，28（5/6）：423-436. doi：10.1007/s105 32-017-9806-9 .
[37]	WU H Z， WANG M， ZHU S， et al. Structure and function of microbial community associated with phenol co-substrate in degradation of benzo[a]pyrene in coking wastewater[J]. Chemosphere，2019，228：128-138. doi：10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.117 .
[38]	ABURTO-MEDINA A， SHAHSAVARI E， TAHA M， et al. The impacts of different biological treatments on the transformation of explosives waste contaminated sludge[J]. Molecules，2021，26（16）：4814. doi：10.3390/molecules26164814 .
[39]	URAKAMI T， TAMAOKA J， SUZUKI K I， et al. Acidomonas gen. nov.， incorporating Acetobacter methanolicus as Acidomonas methanolica comb. nov[J]. Int J Syst Bacteriol，1989，39（1）：50-55. doi：10.1099/00207713-39-1-50 .
[40]	BOON N， WINDT W D， VERSTRAETE W， et al. Evaluation of nested PCR‒DGGE （denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis） with group-specific 16S rRNA primers for the analysis of bacterial communities from different wastewater treatment plants[J]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol，2002，39（2）：101-112. doi：10.1111/j.1574-6941.2002.tb00911.x .
[41]	SUN J， HU S H， SHARMA K R， et al. Stratified microbial structure and activity in sulfide- and methane-producing anaerobic sewer biofilms[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol，2014，80（22）：7042-7052. doi：10.1128/AEM.02146-14 .
[42]	DEL BUSSO ZAMPIERI B， NOGUEIRA E W， DE OLIVEIRA A J F C， et al. Effects of metals on activity and community of sulfate-reducing bacterial enrichments and the discovery of a new heavy metal-resistant SRB from Santos Port sediment （São Paulo， Brazil）[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int，2022，29（1）：922-935. doi：10.1007/s11356-021-15418-9 .
[43]	ZHANG Y， XU Z X， CHU W H， et al. Tracking the source of antibiotic resistome in the stormwater network drainage in the presence of sewage illicit connections[J]. Sci Total Environ，2024，912：168989. doi：10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168989 .
[44]	DUFRESNE S， BOUSQUET J， BOISSINOT M， et al. Sulfobacillus disulfidooxidans sp. nov.， a new acidophilic， disulfide-oxidizing， gram-positive， spore-forming bacterium[J]. Int J Syst Bacteriol，1996，46（4）：1056-1064. doi：10.1099/00207713-46-4-1056 .
[45]	DELGADO-BAQUERIZO M， MAESTRE F T， REICH P B， et al. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Nat Commun，2016，7：10541. doi：10.1038/ncomms10541 .
[46]	LIANG X M， HAN X L， LIU C H， et al. Integrating the salivary microbiome in the forensic toolkit by 16S rRNA gene： Potential application in body fluid identification and biogeographic inference[J]. Int J Legal Med，2022，136（4）：975-985. doi：10. 1007/s00414-022-02831-z .
[47]	LI L Y， CHING W K， LIU Z P. Robust biomarker screening from gene expression data by stable machine learning-recursive feature elimination methods[J]. Comput Biol Chem，2022，100：107747. doi：10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2022.107747 .